- If the government is not transparent, the public could stop participating in measures to prevent the spreading of the virus, one scientist says.
- At least one member of the Ministerial Advisory Committee says advisories prepared for the government should remain confidential.
- There are doubts whether the advisories are ever “taken forward” for discussion in higher government structures.
Health Minister Zweli Mkhize should make the details of more than 70 advisories drafted for the government by the Ministerial Advisory Committee (MAC) on Covid-19 public because there is no reason not to do so.
LIVE | All the latest coronavirus and lockdown updates
This should be done so the public could see for themselves what scientific advice was offered to the government, senior members of the MAC told News24 this week.
The Department of Health steadfastly refuses to release the advisories, with Mkhize arguing it might mistakenly be taken as official policy.
Some advisories have been publicized, such as the MAC’s recommendations on the use of a cheap steroid to treat Covid-19 patients, and an advisory related to the wearing of masks.
READ | SA Covid cases growing at a higher rate than any other country – but we have one of the lowest mortality rates
Frustration seems to be building among some MAC members who feel the lack of transparency is complicating the fight against the virus because the public is increasingly questioning the rationale behind regulations.
The head of the Ezintsha Health Unit at the University of the Witwatersrand, Professor Francois Venter, said he believed due to “micromanagement and gross inconsistencies and even hypocrisy” seen in regulations, the social contract to prevent the spread of the virus had been broken.
“This is because the public may stop participating in key measures – like social distancing, mask-wearing and hand-washing – to prevent the spread of the virus if they do not understand the reasons behind decisions.
“You can attend church but not your family dinner.
“You can get in a crowded taxi at 6am but not drive at 10pm. Public health is about trust, transparency and consistency, we are not seeing this,” Venter told News24.
At least one member of the MAC who News24 spoke to, however, said he agreed with Mkhize’s refusal to issue the advisories to the public.
“The MAC advises the minister, not the public. That is the purpose of the MAC. I am of the opinion that MAC advisories flow to the minister who then decides if he accepts the advice or not,” said retired colonel Theo Ligthelm, a former officer in the SA National Defence Force’s Medical Health Services (SAMHS) as well as former head of military health operations and consultant in disaster medicine planning.
Pros and cons
Dr Shabir Madhi, a professor of vaccinology at the University of the Witwatersrand, told News24 while it was the prerogative of the government to make its advisories public, he felt they should be.
He said this would allow the public a chance to inform themselves on how the government formulates its policy.
Madhi added the advisories were based on science, which was already out in the public, so there should be no reason they could not be released to the public.
However, he also explained the pros and cons to releasing the advisories, saying: “The pros would be that you are much more transparent in terms of decision-making and the public knows what scientists have actually advised.
“The cons of it is that if the government decides to go a different route other than what is being advised then they would need to basically justify it. So, it can create some level of confusion for the public as to why the scientists are advising one thing and the government is doing another thing.”
Dr Shabir Madh
The head of infectious diseases at Helen Joseph Hospital, Dr Jeremy Nel, also believed the advisories should be available to the public, saying it “would transform the MAC to something closer to an independent scientific advisory body, which would be a welcome change”.
“Naturally, the government would be free to apply or reject the advice, there may well be other non-medical factors that they would apply to their decision-making process, and that is to be expected.
“But, making the advisories public would subject both the advisories and the government’s decision-making process to greater public scrutiny as well as to constructive criticism. This is healthy both from a scientific and democratic standpoint,” Nel said.
“In addition, it would help facilitate key health messaging by being able to communicate advice directly to the public,” he added.
READ | Covid-19: Are SA’s district hospitals government’s coronavirus blindspot?
Another scientist, who also advises government and who wished to anonymous for fear of reprisal, said many MAC members would like to see this information (the advisories) in the public domain so people could see what was being debated.
While MAC advisors spend hours and weekends drafting the advisories, the source said they were doubtful as to whether these were taken forward for consideration.
Some advisories have been issued, but only when “it suited” the government, the individual added.
The source believed one reason the government had not made advisories public was because South Africa’s politicians were “not used to being transparent” or being held accountable, the source said.
News24 has filed Promotion of Access to Information Act requests, seeking access to the advisories and more detailed data collected by the government on Covid-19.
Stay healthy and entertained during the national lockdown. Sign up for our Lockdown Living newsletter. Sign up and manage your newsletters in the new News24 app by clicking on the Profile tab
